
| Course Code | : SOSY546 |
| Course Type | : Area Elective |
| Couse Group | : Second Cycle (Master's Degree) |
| Education Language | : Turkish |
| Work Placement | : N/A |
| Theory | : 3 |
| Prt. | : 0 |
| Credit | : 3 |
| Lab | : 0 |
| ECTS | : 5 |
Recently, we have faced many devastating disasters, especially the COVID-19 pandemic, earthquakes, forest fires, floods, both in the country and globally. The aim of this course will be to approach disasters from a sociological perspective, accompanied by conceptual and theoretical discussions. The first of the questions asked by the sociology of disaster is what is the importance of social factors in terms of events defined as natural phenomena? Second, how do social factors shape the origins, course and consequences of natural disasters? In the course, we will examine the causes and consequences of various types of disasters after a broad theoretical analysis based on these questions.
Disasters have been conceived and understood in very different ways in different times and societies. In this context, disaster types, especially historically important disasters, and conceptual and theoretical approaches to disasters will be examined. Again, questions such as how disasters affect the structures, interactions and subjective perceptions among community members will also be searched for answers. Then, what are the factors that influence the cultural representation of disasters? Theoretical theoretical literature in the field of disasters and risk society will be examined. Finally, we will explore the role of urban legends and disaster rumors, particularly earthquake rumors.
| 1. | Comprehension of the main conceptual and theoretical discussions related to the sociology of risk and disaster |
| 2. | To be able to establish the relationship between the sociology of risk and disaster debates and theories and advanced general social theory and to discuss these current disasters |
| 3. | Ability to comprehend sociocultural, economic, political, etc. vulnerabilities that play a role in the occurrence of disasters, and to make empirical researches by using sociological methods and techniques by associating them with current sociological theories |
| 4. | Ability to analyze existing social inequalities (such as gender, ethnicity, religious, cultural and economic, etc.) in the context of various disasters, taking into account the socio-economic, cultural, political and systemic vulnerabilities that play a role in the emergence of disasters |
| 5. | To be able to display a critical and objective approach in the process of examining and making sense of various disasters |
| 1. | DELİBAŞ, K (2017) Risk Toplumu, Belirsizlikler ve Söylentiler Sosyolojisi, (Risk Society: Uncartinty and Roumours Sociology), Ayrıntı Yayınları, İstanbul |
| 2. | Delibaş K., (2013) ‘21st December Doomsday rumours: Late Modern Anxieties or Hangovers from Our Superstitious Past?’ ESA 11th Conference: Crisis, Critique and Change, 28-31 August, Torino, Italy. |
| 3. | Erikson, Kai. 1976. Everything in its path: destruction of community in the Buffalo Creek flood. New York: Simon and Schuster. |
| 4. | Klinenberg, Eric. 2002. Heat wave: a social autopsy of disaster in Chicago. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| 5. | Clarke, Lee Ben. 1999. Mission improbable: using fantasy documents to tame disaster. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| 6. | 2006. Worst cases: terror and catastrophe in the popular imagination. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. |
| 7. | Tierney, Kathleen J. 2007. “From the Margins to the Mainstream? Disaster Research at the Crossroads.” Annual Review of Sociology 33:503-525 |
| 8. | Giroux, Henry. 2006. “Reading Hurricane Katrina: Race, Class, and the Biopolitics of Disposability.” College Literature 33(3): 171-196 |
| 9. | Snider, Laureen. 2004. “Resisting Neoliberalism: The Poisoned Water Disaster in Walkerton, Ontario.” Social and Legal Studies 13: 265-289 |
| 10. | Fothergill, Alice and Lori Peek. 2004. “Poverty and Disasters in the United States: A Review of Recent Sociological Findings.” Natural Hazards 32(1): 89- 110. |
| Type of Assessment | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Midterm Examination | 1 | %40 |
| Final Examination | 1 | %60 |
| Activities | Count | Preparation | Time | Total Work Load (hours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture - Theory | 14 | 0 | 3 | 42 |
| Assignment | 2 | 13 | 2 | 30 |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 25 | 2 | 27 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 25 | 3 | 28 |
| TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) | 127 | |||
PÇ-1 | PÇ-2 | PÇ-3 | PÇ-4 | PÇ-5 | PÇ-6 | PÇ-7 | PÇ-8 | PÇ-9 | PÇ-10 | PÇ-11 | |
OÇ-1 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
OÇ-2 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 5 | 4 |
OÇ-3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 3 | 4 | 4 |
OÇ-4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 3 |
OÇ-5 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 3 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 4 | 4 | 4 |