Information Package / Course Catalogue
Planning Studio II
Course Code: PM406
Course Type: Required
Couse Group: First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree)
Education Language: Turkish
Work Placement: N/A
Theory: 4
Prt.: 2
Credit: 5
Lab: 0
ECTS: 7
Objectives of the Course

In this course, it is aimed to transform the spatial context, inventory, and analysis findings developed for the study area selected within the scope of Planning Studio I into the stages of synthesis, strategy development, focus area selection, and planning decision-making. The course aims to enable students to develop planning decisions in line with the principles of conservation-use balance, ecological thresholds, open-green space systems, green infrastructure, ecosystem services, and sustainable land use by interpreting natural, cultural, socio-economic, and spatial landscape layers together. Within the scope of the course, it is intended to strengthen students’ ability to transfer synthesis and strategy decisions developed at upper scales through inventory and analysis studies to focus areas, justify levels of intervention, establish consistency across scales, and express planning decisions through sheets, reports, and jury/project presentations.

Course Content

In this course, the synthesis, strategy development, focus area selection, and planning decision-making stages of the landscape planning process are addressed through a studio/project-based approach based on a selected case study area. Previous analyses and field observations related to the study area are re-evaluated in terms of problems, opportunities, pressures, threats, sensitivities, potentials, and spatial thresholds. Students are expected to produce synthesis and strategy sheets, focus area sheets, a planning decisions report, conceptual spatial representation outputs, and a jury/project presentation. Throughout the course, decisions related to conservation, improvement, guidance, limitation, and sustainable use are associated with open-green space systems, green infrastructure, ecosystem services, natural and cultural heritage values, and environmental impacts. Course assessment is based on in-term studies and the final examination. The in-term assessment accounts for 40% of the total grade and consists of class participation/performance, assignments, and the midterm examination. The end-of-term assessment is based on the final examination, which accounts for 60% of the total grade. The final submission consists of synthesis and strategy sheets, focus area sheets, a planning decisions report, and a project presentation. The assessment takes into account the relationship between planning decisions and analyses, consistency across scales, the quality of sheet and report narratives, presentation quality, and the student’s development throughout the studio process. Students retaking the course are required to complete all assignments, class participation/performance activities, and examinations again in accordance with the current assessment and evaluation structure of the course.

Name of Lecturer(s)
Prof. Ebru ERSOY TONYALOĞLU
Learning Outcomes
1.To evaluate the analysis, inventory and field observation findings produced in Planning Studio I as a basis for spatial planning decisions (Knowledge, Skills and Competence Level).
2.To interpret problems, opportunities, pressures, threats, sensitivities, and potentials holistically by reading the natural, cultural, socio-economic, and spatial layers of the landscape together.
3.To define a planning vision, objectives, targets and intervention priorities in response to environmental pressures, ecological sensitivities, problems, opportunities and potentials (Knowledge, Skills and Competence Level).
4.To produce land-use decisions, focus area decisions and planning decisions in line with the principles of conservation-use balance, ecosystem services, open-green space systems, green infrastructure and sustainable land use (Knowledge, Skills and Competence Level).
5.To express the developed synthesis, strategy, focus area and planning decisions, together with their justifications, visually, in writing and orally through boards, reports and jury/project presentations (Knowledge, Skills and Competence Level).
Recommended or Required Reading
1.Kaya, M. Y., & Uzun, O. (2019). Ekosistem hizmetleri ve mekânsal planlama ilişkisinin peyzaj planlama çerçevesinde değerlendirilmesi. Düzce Üniversitesi Bilim ve Teknoloji Dergisi, 7(3), 2166-2193.
2.Steiner, F. R. (2012). The living landscape: an ecological approach to landscape planning. Island Press.
3.Leitao, A. B., & Ahern, J. (2002). Applying landscape ecological concepts and metrics in sustainable landscape planning. Landscape and urban planning, 59(2), 65-93.
4.Tress, B., Tres, G., Fry, G., & Opdam, P. (Eds.). (2005). From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
5.Ahern, J. (2006). Theories, methods and strategies for sustainable landscape planning. From landscape research to landscape planning. Aspects of integration, education and application, 119-131.
6.Selman, P. (2012). Sustainable landscape planning: The reconnection agenda. Routledge.
7.Machar, I. (2020). Sustainable landscape management and planning. Sustainability, 12(6), 2354.
8.Tress, B., Tres, G., Fry, G., & Opdam, P. (Eds.). (2005). From landscape research to landscape planning: Aspects of integration, education and application (Vol. 12). Springer Science & Business Media.
9.Selman, P. (2006). Planning at the landscape scale. Routledge.
10.von Haaren, C., Lovett, A. A., & Albert, C. (2019). Landscape planning with ecosystem services. Springer Netherlands.
11.Austin, G. (2014). Green infrastructure for landscape planning: integrating human and natural systems. Routledge.
12.La Riccia, L. (2017). Landscape planning at the local level. Springer International Publishing.
13.Cassatella, C., & Peano, A. (2011). Landscape indicators. Springer.
14.Steinitz, C. (2008). Landscape planning: A brief history of influential ideas. Journal of Landscape Architecture, 3(1), 68-74.
Weekly Detailed Course Contents
Week 1 - Theoretical & Practice
Introduction to the course; review of the study area and previous analysis process; explanation of studio workflow, submissions and assessment criteria.
Week 2 - Theoretical & Practice
Evaluation of analysis findings; review of planning aim, objectives and the main problem-opportunity-pressure relationships of the area.
Week 3 - Theoretical & Practice
Transition from analysis to synthesis; establishment of the decision-making logic and determination of data layers for the synthesis board.
Week 4 - Theoretical & Practice
Preliminary synthesis study; integration of problem, opportunity, pressure, threat, sensitivity and potential relationships.
Week 5 - Theoretical & Practice
Preparation for fieldwork / focal area on-site evaluation; definition of observation themes, decision-control criteria and candidate focal areas.
Week 6 - Theoretical & Practice
Fieldwork / on-site examination of focal areas; photography, sketches, decision-observation notes and comparison with field reality.
Week 7 - Theoretical & Practice
Transfer of field observations into synthesis and strategy decisions; development of decision justifications.
Week 8 - Theoretical & Practice
Development of synthesis boards; overlay reading of analysis layers and integrated spatial evaluation.
Week 9 - Theoretical & Practice
Development of strategy boards; conservation, improvement, guidance, limitation and sustainable use decisions.
Week 10 - Theoretical & Practice
Identification of candidate focal areas; selection justifications, relationship with objectives and definition of intervention priorities.
Week 11 - Theoretical & Practice
Development of focal area boards; focal area planning decisions, intervention levels and conceptual spatial representation.
Week 12 - Theoretical & Practice
Development of the planning decisions report; explanation of synthesis, strategy, focal area decisions and cross-scale relationships.
Week 13 - Theoretical & Practice
Preparation for final submission; revisions of boards, report and presentation, and development of legend and narrative language.
Week 14 - Theoretical & Practice
Final submission and Jury / Project Presentation; evaluation of synthesis, strategy, focal area decisions, planning report and presentation outputs.
Assessment Methods and Criteria
Type of AssessmentCountPercent
Attending Lectures1%5
Land Work1%5
Assignment2%20
Project1%60
Midterm Examination1%10
Workload Calculation
ActivitiesCountPreparationTimeTotal Work Load (hours)
Lecture - Theory140463
Lecture - Practice141242
Assignment37330
Project1201030
Land Work1156
Midterm Examination1314
TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours)175
Contribution of Learning Outcomes to Programme Outcomes
PÇ-1
PÇ-2
PÇ-3
PÇ-4
PÇ-5
PÇ-6
PÇ-7
PÇ-8
PÇ-9
PÇ-10
PÇ-11
PÇ-12
OÇ-1
3
3
4
3
4
2
3
OÇ-2
4
4
5
4
2
5
2
4
OÇ-3
3
5
5
4
3
2
5
3
5
OÇ-4
3
5
5
2
4
3
2
5
3
5
OÇ-5
2
3
3
3
5
2
4
3
3
Adnan Menderes University - Information Package / Course Catalogue
2026