
| Course Code | : EFS185 |
| Course Type | : Non Departmental Elective |
| Couse Group | : First Cycle (Bachelor's Degree) |
| Education Language | : Turkish |
| Work Placement | : N/A |
| Theory | : 2 |
| Prt. | : 0 |
| Credit | : 2 |
| Lab | : 0 |
| ECTS | : 3 |
This course aims to help students develop into individuals who understand water not only as a scientific resource but also in terms of its social, political, economic, ethical, and cultural dimensions. The central goal of the course is to cultivate “water-literate” individuals who can develop critical, systemic, and interdisciplinary thinking skills to address complex water-related issues; integrate scientific evidence with social perspectives; and possess the capacity for both individual and collective action.
This course examines water both as a scientific resource and in terms of its social, political, economic, ethical, and cultural dimensions. Students develop an interdisciplinary perspective through topics such as the natural and anthropogenic water cycle, water quality, climate change, water scarcity, socio-hydrology, water management, and water justice. It aims to cultivate water-literate individuals by fostering systemic thinking, socio-scientific reasoning, and the capacity for individual and collective action.
| 1. | They can explain the theoretical foundations of water literacy, its multidimensional structure (knowledge, attitudes, skills, behavior, ethics), and various conceptual frameworks such as the hydrological–hydrosocial cycle. |
| 2. | Can describe the functioning of the natural and anthropogenic water cycles, water quality parameters, and types of pollution using scientific concepts, and evaluate them in different contexts |
| 3. | It can analyze global water issues—such as climate change, water scarcity, and the Food–Energy–Water Nexus—from an interdisciplinary perspective. |
| 4. | Can discuss the strengths and limitations of water management approaches, policies, and legal frameworks at the national and international levels by comparing them |
| 5. | We can interpret the different approaches that view water as a public resource, a commercial commodity, and a human right within the framework of environmental justice and ethical principles. |
| 6. | By analyzing a socio-hydrological problem using systems thinking and socio-scientific reasoning, it is possible to integrate the perspectives of different stakeholders |
| 7. | They can develop and present a comprehensive solution proposal that addresses the scientific, social, and ethical dimensions of a local or global water issue, along with evaluation criteria. |
| 1. | Bakker, K. (2010). Privatizing water: Governance failure and the world’s urban water crisis. Cornell University Press. |
| 2. | Birleşmiş Milletler Genel Kurulu. (2010, 28 Temmuz). İnsan hakkı olarak temiz su ve sanitasyon (Karar 64/292) [The human right to water and sanitation, Resolution 64/292]. https://undocs.org/A/RES/64/292 |
| 3. | Boelens, R., Perreault, T., & Vos, J. (Eds.). (2018). Water justice. Cambridge University Press. https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316831847 |
| 4. | Chang, R., & Goldsby, K. A. (2016). Chemistry (12th ed.). McGraw-Hill Education. |
| 5. | Demir, F. B., & Ulukaya Öteleş, Ü. (2023). Reflection of water literacy in the environmental education and climate change course teaching program. Bulletin of Educational Studies, 2(2), 50–57. |
| 6. | European Commission. (2000). Directive 2000/60/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council establishing a framework for community action in the field of water policy. Official Journal of the European Communities, L 327, 1–72. https://eur-lex.europa.eu/eli/dir/2000/60/oj |
| 7. | Forbes, C. T., Brozovic, N., Franz, T. E., Lally, D. E., & Petitt, D. N. (2018). Water in society: An interdisciplinary course to support undergraduate students’ water literacy. Journal of College Science Teaching, 48(1), 36–42. https://doi.org/10.2505/4/jcst18_048_01_36 |
| 8. | Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. (2023). Climate change 2023: Synthesis report. Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Sixth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (H. Lee & J. Romero, Eds.). IPCC. https://doi.org/10.59327/IPCC/AR6-9789291691647 |
| 9. | McCarroll, M., & Hamann, H. (2020). What we know about water: A water literacy review. Water, 12(10), 2803. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102803 |
| 10. | Moreno-Guerrero, A.-J., Romero-Rodríguez, J.-M., López-Belmonte, J., & Alonso-García, S. (2020). Flipped learning approach as educational innovation in water literacy. Water, 12(2), 574. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12020574 |
| 11. | Mostacedo-Marasovic, S.-J., Lally, D., Petitt, D. N., White, H., & Forbes, C. (2022). Supporting undergraduate students’ developing water literacy during a global pandemic: A longitudinal study. Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Science Education Research, 4(1), 9. https://doi.org/10.1186/s43031-022-00049-y |
| 12. | Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development. (2015). OECD principles on water governance. OECD Publishing. https://www.oecd.org/cfe/regionaldevelopment/OECD-Principles-on-Water-Governance.pdf |
| 13. | Owens, D. C., Petitt, D. N., Lally, D., & Forbes, C. T. (2020). Cultivating water literacy in STEM education: Undergraduates’ socio-scientific reasoning about socio-hydrologic issues. Water, 12(10), 2857. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12102857 |
| 14. | Sadler, T. D. (Ed.). (2011). Socio-scientific issues in the classroom: Teaching, learning and research. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-1159-4 |
| 15. | Sammel, A., & McMartin, D. (2014). Teaching and knowing beyond the water cycle: What does it mean to be water literate? Creative Education, 5(10), 835–848. https://doi.org/10.4236/ce.2014.510097 |
| 16. | Seraphin, K. D. (2020). Enhancing water literacy through an innovative television series focused on Wai Maoli: Hawai‘i fresh water initiative. Water, 12(11), 3247. https://doi.org/10.3390/w12113247 |
| 17. | Sivapalan, M., Savenije, H. H. G., & Blöschl, G. (2012). Socio-hydrology: A new science of people and water. Hydrological Processes, 26(8), 1270–1276. https://doi.org/10.1002/hyp.8426 |
| 18. | Swyngedouw, E. (2004). Social power and the urbanization of water: Flows of power. Oxford University Press. |
| 19. | T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı, Su Yönetimi Genel Müdürlüğü. (2019). Ulusal su planı (2019–2023). T.C. Tarım ve Orman Bakanlığı. https://www.tarimorman.gov.tr/SYGM |
| 20. | UNESCO. (2021). The United Nations world water development report 2021: Valuing water. UNESCO. https://unesdoc.unesco.org/ark:/48223/pf0000375724 |
| Type of Assessment | Count | Percent |
|---|---|---|
| Attending Lectures | 1 | %5 |
| Assignment | 1 | %5 |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | %30 |
| Final Examination | 1 | %60 |
| Activities | Count | Preparation | Time | Total Work Load (hours) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lecture - Theory | 14 | 0 | 2 | 28 |
| Assignment | 1 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| Reading | 14 | 1 | 0 | 14 |
| Midterm Examination | 1 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| Final Examination | 1 | 10 | 1 | 11 |
| TOTAL WORKLOAD (hours) | 75 | |||
PÇ-1 | PÇ-2 | PÇ-3 | PÇ-4 | PÇ-5 | PÇ-6 | PÇ-7 | PÇ-8 | PÇ-9 | PÇ-10 | |
OÇ-1 | 3 | 3 | ||||||||
OÇ-2 | 3 | |||||||||
OÇ-3 | 3 | |||||||||
OÇ-4 | 3 | |||||||||
OÇ-5 | 3 | |||||||||
OÇ-6 | 3 | |||||||||
OÇ-7 | 3 | |||||||||